| University | National Institute of Education (NIE) |
| Subject | QED50/52A Educational Psychology: Theories and Applications for Learning and Teaching |
QED50/52A Coursework 2026
Overview Of The Course
This course provides the foundation for understanding the 21st-century learners, learner development, and the psychology of learning and motivation. The ways in which these aspects influence the processes of learning will be considered, and proactive approaches to enhancing student motivation, learning, and thinking explored. Theories with a focus on students’ psychosocial and cognitive development will be introduced and their implications for classroom-practice considered. In particular, the course will explore how students learn and the challenges they face in the process. Students’ cognitive, social, emotional, personal and moral development will be considered.
Student teachers will synthesize and consolidate the key concepts learnt to establish explicit theorypractice links and analyse issues in authentic classroom scenarios. This enables the student teachers to leverage on the acquired theoretical-knowledge to make theory-based decisions for enhancing teaching and the design of learning experiences.
Learning Outcomes
Student teachers will develop a positive and professional attitude towards teaching and acquire knowledge and relevant skills to become caring, committed, creative and effective teachers. By the end of this course, student teachers will be able to:
- identify the role of educational psychology in the teacher’s decision-making process;
- describe the developmental needs of students;
- explain cognitive, psychosocial and cultural factors that may facilitate or impede the development of students and their learning;
- synthesize the concepts of student development and learning theories and apply this knowledge in teaching and the design of learning experiences;
- use different theoretical explanations for learner motivation to enhance student engagement in learning;
- describe several types of higher-level thinking skills (such as creativity, critical thinking, decisionmaking, and problem-solving) and explore ways that teachers can foster them
- explain the principles of differentiated instruction and apply these in responding to the needs of diverse learners in the classroom
Course Content
Understanding the Learner
- The Role of Contemporary Educational Psychology in Effective Teaching and Learning
- Social Contexts of Development of the 21st Century Learner
- Personal Development
- Moral Development
- Social Development and Social Emotional Learning
- Learner Diversity I: Understanding and Meeting the Needs of Diverse Learners
Understanding the Learning Process
- Motivation in Learning and Teaching
- Learning as a Behavioural Change
- Learning by Doing
- Learning by Thinking
- Complex Cognitive Processes – Eliciting Higher Order Responses
- Learner Diversity II: Catering to the Needs of Diverse Learners
Course Assessment
| No. | Assessment component | Weightage (%) | Due Date |
| 1 | Class Participation | 5 | Ongoing |
| 2 | PBL Presentation
PBL Peer Evaluation |
30
5 |
Week 12 |
| 3 | Quiz | 10 | Week 9 |
| 4 | Individual Assignment | 50 | 3 May Sunday 2359hrs |
Details on Assessment
1. Class Participation (5%)
Rubrics for Class Participation
| Criteria | Below Expectation | Approaching Expectation | Meeting Expectation | Exceeding Expectation |
| Frequency and Quality of
Participation |
0 – 1 marks | 2 marks | 3 marks | 4 – 5 marks |
| Student never/ rarely contributes to class
and needs an instructor to solicit input. |
Student seldom contributes to class discussion. | Student contributes to class discussion some of the time. | Student contributes to class discussion most of the time. | |
| Contributions are superficial. | Contributions are insightful. | Contributions are very insightful. |
2. Problem-Based Learning: Group Project – 30% The PBL Process:
| Learning Stage | Learners’ Activities | Learner Deliverables | |
| Session 9
Briefing (15 min) |
♦
♦ ♦ |
Formation of PBL Groups (Max 5
Groups) Allocation of Scenarios to groups Brief overview of Problem-based Learning |
Post-Lesson Activity: View respective scenario to identify possible problems for discussion in week 6 |
| Session 10:
Stage 1 Identification of Key Problems
Stage 2 Application of Theories
|
♦ | Brainstorming and analysis of the problem; generation of possible explanations. | ♦ Compile a list of key problems identified
♦ Apply the relevant key concepts to analyze issues in authentic classroom settings
|
| ♦
♦ ♦ |
Brainstorming and analysis of problem; generation of possible explanations,
Make linkages to theories learnt in Week 1-5 Assignment of Self-Directed Learning |
Analyze the scenario and identify at least 3 key problems/classroom issues. Use relevant theories in the following domains to conceptualize the problems. ♦ Social Context of Development
♦ Personal Development ♦ Moral Development ♦ Social Development ♦ Motivation |
|
| Session 11:
Stage 3 Proposal of Theorybased Solutions and Consolidation |
♦
♦ ♦ |
Report on self-direct learning (prepare to tell your group members what you have read).
Consolidate information shared in Stage 2 and propose theory-based solutions to the 5 problems identified. Preparation for group presentation |
♦ Integration and consolidation of information as a group
♦ Use theories to generate practical solutions ♦ Presentation materials |
| Session 12:
Stage 4 Solution Presentation and Evaluation |
♦ | Group presentation of findings | ♦ Each group will be given 15 minutes to present. The presentation should include the following:
o The 3 key problems from the scenario o The theories used to conceptualize the problems o Practical solutions informed by theory o The list of references used ♦ Submission of soft copies of your group presentation slides by the start of class on Week 12. |
PBL Template (Optional)
| Domain | Identification of Key
Problems (Stage 1) |
Application of Theories (Stage 2) | Proposal of Theorybased Solutions (Stage 3) |
Note:
▪ The goal of the assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to clearly demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the issues explored in this course (i.e., the textbooks, course notes, and supplementary readings).
▪ Be sure to make explicit links to course concepts about psychosocial development and the social context of development.
▪ Cite and list all references used in your presentation.
▪ Use the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.) (2010) or APA publication manual (BF76.7Pub) to guide your referencing. Information on the APA format can also be found at the following website:
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.ht ml
Rubrics for Problem-Based Learning Group Project (30%)
| Criteria | Below Expectation | Approaching Expectation | Meeting Expectation | Exceeding Expectation |
| Problem
Identification & Analysis |
0 – 2 marks | 3 – 4 marks | 5 – 7 marks | 8 – 10 marks |
| ● Not able to identify the problems in the scenario and facts identified are irrelevant
● Problems identified are not linked to relevant theories ● Problem analysis is not clear and is unlikely to lead to useful theoryinformed solutions |
● Somewhat able to identify the problems and relevant facts in the scenario
● Problems identified are somewhat linked to relevant theories ● Problem analysis is somewhat articulated; they are somewhat likely to lead to useful theory-informed solutions |
● Able to identify the problems and relevant facts in the scenario
● Problems identified are linked to relevant theories ● Problem analysis is clearly and comprehensively articulated; they are likely to lead to useful theoryinformed solutions |
● Able to clearly identify the problems and relevant facts in the scenario
● Problems identified are explicitly linked to relevant theories ● Problem analysis is very clearly and comprehensively articulated; they will lead to useful theory-informed solutions |
|
| Scope of Solution | 0 – 2 marks | 3 – 4 marks | 5 – 7 marks | 8 – 10 marks |
| ● Theories are not clearly stated and linked to the solutions
● Many errors in explanations of theories and concepts ● Links between scenario and solutions are unclear ● Solutions presented are for the most part, inappropriate |
● Theories are stated somewhat clearly
and somewhat linked to the solutions in some areas ● Several errors in explanations of theories and concepts ● Links between scenario and solutions are clear in some parts ● Solutions presented are appropriate |
● Theories are clearly stated and linked to the solutions
● Some errors in explanations of theories and concepts ● Links between scenario and solutions are clear in most parts ● Solutions presented are appropriate and effective |
● Theories are very clearly stated and linked to the solutions
● No or few errors in explanations of theories and concepts ● Links between scenario and solutions are clear throughout ● Solutions presented are appropriate, effective, and insightful |
|
| Presentation | 0 – 2 marks | 3 – 4 marks | 5 – 7 marks | 8 – 10 marks |
| ● Presentation is unengaging and not organized effectively
● Presentation unclear in most parts with almost no sense of cohesion in the flow ● Shows little confidence in delivery, reading from notes extensively with voice not wellprojected ● Presentation exceeds time limit/not able to |
● Presentation is somewhat creative and organized in a somewhat logical manner and is at times engaging
● Presentation clear in some parts with little sense of cohesion in the flow of the presentation ● Shows some degree of confidence in delivery, reading from notes frequently with |
● Presentation is creative, engaging and presented clearly and precisely and is organized in a logical manner
● Presentation clear in most parts with some sense of cohesion in the flow ● Shows some degree of confidence in delivery, reading from notes occasionally with voice is wellprojected |
● Presentation is very creative, engaging, provocative, and captures the interest of the audience and maintained this throughout the entire presentation
● Presentation clear and fluent throughout with a clear sense of cohesion in the flow ● Shows confidence in delivery, reading from notes judiciously with |
|
| complete presentation | voice somewhat well-projected
● Presentation exceeded time limit but is able to complete presentation |
● Presentation does not exceed time
limit and able to complete presentation |
voice is very wellprojected
● Presentation does not exceed time limit and able to complete presentation |
Peer Evaluation on PBL Assignment
A Peer Evaluation system will be used to ensure fair and equal distribution of work among student teachers for PBL projects. Student teachers will evaluate their group members’ contribution to the PBL project on a 0-5 scale. Each group member’s PBL grade is based on the average peer evaluation score.
The link to the Peer Evaluation form will be put up on the Blackboard Announcement Page by Week 11.
ALL student teachers must complete the form by Week 12.
| Criteria | Below Expectation | Approaching Expectation | Meeting Expectation | Exceeding Expectation |
| Peer Evaluation | 0 – 1 marks | 2 marks | 3 marks | 4 -5 marks |
| This group member
▪ did not complete his/her assigned tasks for the group ▪ contributed work of low quality ▪ did not submit his/her assigned work ▪ is not a team player |
This group member
▪ somewhat completed his/her assigned tasks for the group ▪ produced work of acceptable quality ▪ submitted his/her assigned work late ▪ is somewhat a team player |
This group member
▪ completed most of his/her assigned tasks for the group ▪ produced work of good quality ▪ submitted his/her assigned work on time ▪ is a good team player |
This group member
▪ completed all his/her assigned tasks for the group ▪ produced work of excellent quality ▪ submitted his/her assigned work ahead of time ▪ is an excellent team player |
3. Quiz (Individual) – 10%
Students will have a 10 question online Quiz to determine their understanding of the Learning Theories learnt in class. It will be a self-study, closed-book MCQ Quiz to be done online in class. This will be part of the overall grade for this module, comprising of 10% of the final grade.
4. Individual Assignment – 50%
Lesson Planning The purpose of the assignment is for you to:
- demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the theories you have learned in this module;
- synthesize the concepts of student development and learning theories and apply this knowledge in teaching and the design of learning experiences;
- make connections between these theories and various aspects of lesson planning.
Instructions:
- Identify a lesson from one of your CS subjects that you plan to teach. The lesson should be a 60minute lesson.
- Use the first page of the lesson plan template to provide the rationale and explanation for the overarching approach to your lesson plan. Through describing your approach, you should answer the following:
o What is the level you are teaching? Please indicate the stream if you are developing a lesson plan for secondary school teaching.
o What is your students’ prior knowledge?
o How does this lesson build on your students’ prior knowledge and how does it link to previous or future lessons? - Develop a lesson plan based on the given template (see below). The lesson plan should answer all of the following:
o What are the instructional objectives of your lesson? You should have 2 objectives.
o What is the approximate time required for the introduction, body and conclusion of the lesson?
o What are the materials and resources required for the lesson?
o What do you plan to do for the introduction or the pre-activity of the lesson?
o What do you plan to do for the body or the main activities of the lesson?
o What do you plan to do for the conclusion or the post activity of the lesson?
o Does the lesson fulfil the instructional objectives that you identify? - In the Rationale column, provide brief descriptions of the theories before you make the connections with your planned instructional activity in the Introduction, Body, and Conclusion of the lesson. You should demonstrate 1+2+1 theories or variations of the same theories. You may want to select from the theories below:
o Understanding the Learner: Personal Development (Week 2 – Non-learning Theories)
▪ Erik Erikson’s Stages of Development
▪ James Marcia’s Identity Status Theory
▪ Self-Concept & Self Esteem
▪ The Pygmalion Effect
o Understanding the Learner: Moral Development (Week 3 – Non-learning Theories)
▪ Piaget
▪ Kohlberg
▪ Gilligan
▪ Lickona
o Understanding the Learner: Social Development and Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) (Week 4 – Non-learning Theories)
▪ Emotional development
▪ Social development
▪ Social-emotional learning
▪ Bullying
o Motivation in Learning (Week 5 – Non-learning Theories)
▪ Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
▪ Self-Determination Theories
▪ Achievement Goal Theory
▪ Attribution Theory
o Understanding the Learning Process (Weeks 6 to 8 – Learning Theories)
▪ Behaviourism
▪ Classical Conditioning
▪ Operant Conditioning
o Understanding the Learning Process (Weeks 6 to 8 – Learning Theories)
▪ Constructivism
▪ Personal constructivism – Piaget
▪ Social-Constructivist Approach: Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory
o Understanding the Learning Process (Weeks 6 to 8 – Learning Theories
▪ Contemporary Cognitive Theories
▪ Information Processing Model
o Learner Diversity I: Understanding and Meeting the Needs of Diverse Learners (Week 9 – Learning Theories)
▪ Differentiation
▪ High ability learners
▪ Slow progress learners
o Learner Diversity II: Catering to the Needs of Diverse Learners (Week 13 – Learning Theories)
▪ Problem-Solving
▪ Creativity
▪ Mediated Learning
- Attach the handouts and materials (if applicable) that you plan to give your students to your lesson plan.
- The lesson plan should not exceed 5 pages excluding references, worksheets and resources. It should be typewritten with Arial font size 12 and single-spaced. The page layout should be landscape.
Submission of Assignments:
- Use the Student Declaration form as the cover page, stating your name, matriculation number, programme, course code, title, and submission date.
- Generate a Similarity Report for your assignment (without cover page, appendices and references) using Turnitin in NTULearn. The Similarity report provides a percentage of similarity with other written documents and checks for plagiarism.
- Submit a soft copy of your whole assignment (Similarity report, Declaration cover page, Lesson plan assignment, References, and Appendices) to NTULearn.
Rubric for Individual Assignment: Lesson Planning (50%)
| Criteria | Below Expectation (State learning theories) | Approaching Expectation
(State and explain learning theories) |
Meeting Expectation
(State, explain and good application of learning theories) |
Exceeding Expectation
(State, explain, good application of learning theories with clear link between instructional activities) |
||||||
| Introduction
Preparing learners for learning
1 Theory |
0 – 2 marks | 3 – 4 marks | 5 – 7 marks | 8 – 10 marks | ||||||
| ● Cite 1 learning theory or 1 non-learning theory
● Shows little or no understanding of theories cited ● The rationale shows no attempt to make link between instructional activity/activities and theory
|
● Describe and apply 1 learning theory or 1 nonlearning theory somewhat clearly
● Shows adequate understanding of theory cited ● The rationale shows somewhat clear link between instructional activity/activities and theory cited |
● Describe and apply 1 learning theory or 1 nonlearning theory clearly
● Shows clear understanding of theories cited ● The rationale shows clear link between instructional activity/activities and theories cited |
● Describe and apply 1 learning theory or 1 nonlearning theory very clearly
● Shows insightful understanding of theories cited ● The rationale shows very clear link between instructional activity/activities and theories cited |
|||||||
| Body
Management of learners and learning
|
0 – 4 marks | 5 – 8 marks | 9 – 14 marks | 15 – 20 marks | ||||||
| ● Cite 1 learning theory
● Shows little or no understanding of theories cited ● The rationale shows no attempt to make link between instructional activity/activities and theory
|
● Describe and apply 1 learning theory somewhat clearly
● Shows adequate understanding of theory cited ● The rationale shows somewhat clear link between instructional activity/activities and theory cited |
● Describe and apply 2 theories clearly
● Shows clear understanding of theories cited ● The rationale shows clear link between instructional activity/activities and theories cited |
● Describe and apply 2 learning theories very
clearly ● Shows insightful understanding of theories cited ● The rationale shows very clear link between instructional activity/activities and theories cited |
|||||||
| Conclusion
Closure and consolidation
1 Theory |
0 – 2 marks | 3 – 4 marks | 5 – 7 marks | 8 – 10 marks | ||||||
| ● Cite 1 learning theory or 1 non-learning theory
● Shows little or no understanding of theories cited ● The rationale shows no attempt to make link between instructional activity/activities and theory
|
● Describe and apply 1 learning theory or 1 nonlearning theory somewhat clearly
● Shows adequate understanding of theory cited ● The rationale shows somewhat clear link between instructional activity/activities and theory cited |
● Describe and apply 1 learning theory or 1 nonlearning theory clearly
● Shows clear understanding of theories cited ● The rationale shows clear link between instructional activity/activities and theories cited |
● Describe and apply 1 learning theory or 1 nonlearning theory very clearly
● Shows insightful understanding of theories cited ● The rationale shows very clear link between instructional activity/activities and theories cited |
|||||||
| Introduction and Overall plan | 0 – 2 marks | 3 – 4 marks | 5 – 7 marks | 8 – 10 marks | ||||||
| ● Plan is slipshod and discussion seemed to be superficial
● Instructional activities do not support instructional objectives ● Plan does not encourage and sustain student interest ● Plan does not encourage student participation |
● Plan is not thorough and lacks rigour and depth in discussion.
● Instructional activities somewhat support instructional objectives ● Plan somewhat encourages and sustains student interest ● Plan somewhat encourages student participation |
● Plan is somewhat thorough with rigour and depth in the discussion
● Instructional activities support instructional objectives ● Plan clearly encourages and sustains student interest ● Plan clearly encourages student participation |
● Plan is very thorough with much rigour and depth in the discussion
● Instructional activities strongly support instructional objectives ● Plan very clearly encourages and sustains student interest ● Plan very clearly encourages student participation |
|||||||
Struggling with QED50/52A Educational Psychology: Theories and Applications for Learning and Teaching Coursework?
Native Singapore Writers Team
- 100% Plagiarism-Free Essay
- Highest Satisfaction Rate
- Free Revision
- On-Time Delivery
Facing difficulty with your QED50/52A Educational Psychology Coursework (2026)? Singapore Assignment Help, you can access expert-driven psychology assignment help tailored to lesson plans, PBL, and theory application. For better preparation, check NIE assignment questions before submission. Get started with our online coursework help and receive a fully customised, human-written, plagiarism-free solution.
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your college/ university Assignments.
- MKTG1401 Customer Experience Design Assessment 3 Brief 2026 | RMIT
- SWK363 Introduction to and Assessment Framework for Youth Issues Assignment 2026 | SUSS
- GSBS6514 Leadership in Contemporary Organisations Assessment Brief 2026 | UON
- MKT363 Services Marketing Tutor-Marked Assignment 2026 | SUSS
- ICT226 Enterprise Systems and Integrated Business Process End-of-Course Assessment 2026 | SUSS
- MKTG101 Marketing Coursework Brief 2026 | Singapore Management University
- AVM355 Air Freight Management Group-based Assignment 2026 | SUSS
- COR1100 Writing and Reasoning Assessment 3 , 2026 | SMU
- LOG206 Transport Management and Technology Group-based Assignment 2026 | SUSS
- NCO212 The ‘Smart City’ and Society Pre-Class Quiz Assignment 2026 | SUSS
