Assignment Details:
Article to Critique is: McKee, A. (2017). Happiness traps: How we sabotage. Harvard Business Review. Sept-Oct, 66-73.
| Observable traits | Weigh-tage (%) | 1-4 Poor | 5-7 Average | 8-10 Good | Please rate your own assignment |
| 1. Defines the subject matter, identifies key concepts and maps their relationships | 20% | Does not define the subject matter or identify the key concepts; fails to map the concepts in a logical manner | Defines the subject matter well, identifies nearly all the key concepts, and maps their relationships with one another somewhat logically | Defines the subject matter very well; identifies all the key concepts and maps their relationships with one another logically | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8_9_10 |
| 2. Identifies and considers OTHER theoretical perspectives that are important to the analysis of the issue | 20% | Deals only with a single perspective and fails to discuss other possible perspectives, especially those salient to the issue | Develops a better understanding of the issue by discussing other perspectives drawn from outside sources | Develops a comprehensive understanding of the issue by discussing other perspectives drawn from outside sources | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8_9_10 |
| 3. Identifies and assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence and provides additional data/evidence related to the issue | 20% | Fails to examine the validity of the information provided or provide justification for rejecting arguments provided. Confuses associations and correlations with cause and effect | Examines some of the evidence and source of evidence; questions its accuracy, precision, relevance, and completeness. Observes cause and effect and addresses existing or potential consequences | Examines the evidence and source of evidence; questions its accuracy, precision, relevance, and completeness. Observes cause and effect and addresses existing or potential consequences | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8_9_10 |
| 4. Identifies and considers key assumptions and the influence of the context on the issue | 20% | Does not consider the assumptions of the author, and does not examine the contexts | Identifies and questions the validity of some assumptions made by the author and analyzes the issue with some sense of scope and context | Identifies and questions the validity of assumptions made by the author, and analyzes the issue with a clear sense of scope and context | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8_9_10 |
| 5. Provides a conclusion that discusses the implications of the article and gives an informed, overall evaluation | 20% | Fails to provide a conclusion, or provides a conclusion that is inconsistently tied to the earlier discussion | Provides a conclusion that discusses some implications of the article and gives a good synthesis of the main points discussed | Provides a conclusion that logically discusses implications of the article, and gives an informed and well-thought-out overall evaluation | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8_9_10 |
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments
Native Singapore Writers Team
- 100% Plagiarism-Free Essay
- Highest Satisfaction Rate
- Free Revision
- On-Time Delivery
Get Help By Expert
Hire a Professional Native writer for getting assistance in Singapore colleges & Universities like Nanyang Technological University. SingaporeAssignmentHelp have expert writers to write critical thinking assignments. Hire a dedicated writer and get 100% plagiarised Assignments.
Answer
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your college/ university Assignments.
Recent Solved Questions
- LEGL2002 Enforceability of Contracts and Director Authority in Business Organisations
- HBC201 Exploring NEET Youth in Singapore: Factors, Challenges, and Reintegration Strategies
- MGT204 In-depth Financial Analysis and Investment Strategies for Lioncity Pte Ltd
- EIPM: Sheng Siong Company Valuation Report – Investment Analysis & Recommendations, GBA 4
- ICT239 BMI App Development and Enhancement | ECA – SUSS
- FMT302 Facility Maintenance and Indoor Air Quality Management, ECA
- K-Pop Music Festival Poster Design | Assessment 2, Course Work
- Strategic Implementation of IBM’s Global Talent Analytics: Case study Analysis | Assessment 2
- HFS206 Occupational Biomechanics Assignment Question Papers – SUSS
- PSY205 Analyzing AI Bias: Prejudice in Language Technology and Its Impact in Singapore