Assessment 3 Brief

Module Title	Qualitative Research in Psychology
Assignment Mode	Individual Assignment (Qualitative Research Report)
Word Count Limit	2000 words (+/- 10%)
Citation Format	APA 7.0
Marks	100 marks

Assignment Brief

Assignment Format : Students to develop and work on a research question and complete a research study (excluding memory research) in one of these fields:
(1) wellbeing
(2) counselling
(3) psychology
Reference format – (APA 7th Edition)

The format students should follow:

Research Paper Format

a. APA cover page
b. Abstract
c. Introduction – Background and Context including the research question and purpose.
d. Literature Review
e. Methodology
f. Findings
g. Discussion
h. Conclusion (including Recommendations and Limitations)
i. Appendices (A is the interview questions or open-ended questions in a questionnaire used in data collection and B includes the main themes from the data that have been quoted or cross-referenced in the assignment).
j. References

Assignment Requirements

Word Limit 2000(+/- 10%) words but word count does not include words found on APA cover page, abstract, appendices and references.
Citation and Referencing Format APA 7, font size 12, Times New Roman font, left justified paragraphs, with 1.5 spacing with paragraph indents.
References – You are required to consult and reference a MINIMUM of 10-15articles, of which 90% or more must be from academic journals and the remaining from textbooks, but not from newspapers, blogs, and magazines. Refer to databases found in Google Scholar, ERIC, Proquest and Newslink online or Kaplan’s research journal (https://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt ).

Write My Assignment

🔹 Qualitative Research in Psychology Assessment 3 Guide | Kaplan University

Native Singapore Writers Team

100% Plagiarism-Free Essay
Highest Satisfaction Rate
Free Revision
On-Time Delivery

Qualitative Research in Psychology Assessment 3 Marking Rubric

		Qualitative Research in Psychology
Criteria		Performance descriptors			Total Marks	Marks awarded
Criteria	No mark	Developing	Proficient	Excellent	Total Marks	Marks awarded
Abstract The report plan was fully represented and succinctly highlights the key components of the report plan.	0	1 – 2	3	4 – 5	5
	Abstract is missing or does not reflect the report plan.	Abstract partially reflects the report plan but lacks clarity and conciseness.	Abstract clearly represents the report plan, but minor details are missing.	Abstract fully represents the report plan, succinctly highlighting all key components.	5
Introduction Review of Background, Description of Context, Problem Statement, and Purpose of Research	0	1 – 2	3	4 – 5	5
	Major themes and sources are missing or irrelevant.	Some themes and sources are identified, but the explanation is unclear or lacks coherence.	Most themes and sources are identified and well-reviewed; the issue is explained with a relevant research question.	All themes, sources, and research questions are clearly identified, reviewed, and explained.	5
Literature Review Literature reviewed is relevant, scholarly, and sets up the study’s rationale by identifying a gap in the literature.	0	1 – 4	5 – 7	8 – 10	10
	Literature review is absent or irrelevant.	Literature review is present but lacks relevance, scholarly sources, or does not identify a clear gap.	Literature review is mostly relevant, uses scholarly sources, and identifies a gap in the literature.	Literature review is comprehensive, entirely relevant, uses only scholarly sources, and clearly identifies a gap.	10
Methodology (Including Materials and Procedures)	0	1 – 4	5 – 7	8 – 10	10
Methodology (Including Materials and Procedures)	Methodology is missing or lacks deta	Methodology is present but lacks clarity or logical structure.	Methodology is detailed with clear procedures, materials, and sampling strategy, but minor details are missing.	Methodology is comprehensive, with clear, logical procedures, detailed participant descriptions, and well-explained sampling strategy.	10
Findings (Including Data Analysis Presented in Appendix B)	0	1 – 7	8 – 11	12 – 15	15
	Findings and data analysis are absent or incorrectly presented.	Findings are presented but lack alignment with methods or are partially analyzed.	Findings are well-presented, mostly aligned with methods, and data analyses are mostly correct.	Findings are thoroughly analyzed, perfectly aligned with methods, and data analyses are entirely correct.	15
Discussion Linkages with previous research, explanation of whether the research question was answered, and consideration of alternative viewpoints.	0	1 – 7	8 – 11	12 – 15	15
	Discussion is missing or fails to link with previous research.	Discussion is present but lacks depth, clarity, or linkages with previous research.	Discussion links well with previous research, clearly explains the research question, and considers alternative viewpoints.	Discussion is comprehensive, deeply linked with previous research, and thoroughly considers alternative viewpoints.	15
Conclusion Clear summary statement linking research purpose and results, with a discussion of limitations and implications. Suggestions for further research address gaps.	0	1 – 2	3	4 – 5	5
	Conclusion is missing or does not link the research purpose and results.	Conclusion is present but lacks clarity, does not fully address limitations or implications, or provides weak suggestions for further research.	Conclusion clearly links research purpose and results, discusses limitations, and provides reasonable suggestions for further research.	Conclusion is concise, fully links research purpose and results, thoroughly discusses limitations and implications, and provides insightful suggestions for further research.	5
Usage of Supporting Evidence Evidence cited is relevant, supports viewpoints, and is well-linked to the research question.	0	1 – 4	5 – 7	8 – 10	10
	No supporting evidence provided.	Some evidence is provided, but it is weak, irrelevant, or poorly linked to the research question.	Relevant evidence is provided, supports most viewpoints, and is well-linked to the research question.	All evidence is highly relevant, thoroughly supports viewpoints, and is strongly linked to the research question.	10

Qualitative Research in Psychology
Criteria	Performance descriptors				Total Marks	Marks awarded
	No mark	Developing	Proficient	Excellent
Originality The author’s voice is recognizable, and the research topic is original, relevant, and contributes to academic literature.	0	1 – 4	5 – 7	8 – 10	10
	No originality is evident, and the author’s voice is absent.	Some originality is evident, but the author’s voice is weak, or the topic is not very relevant.	The author’s voice is mostly recognizable, the topic is original, and it contributes to academic literature.)	The author’s voice is strong, the topic is highly original, and it makes a significant contribution to academic literature.
Writing Conventions Evidence of paragraphing, proofreading, usage of correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation.	0	1 – 4	5 – 7	8 – 10	10
	Writing is unclear, with frequent grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.	Writing is mostly clear but contains several grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.	Writing is clear, with minor errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation.	Writing is precise, clear, and free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
APA Referencing Format In-text citations and references are formatted according to APA style with little or no mistakes, and sources are sufficient and authoritative.	0	1 – 2	3	4 – 5	5
	Referencing is absent or does not follow APA format.	Referencing is present but contains multiple errors or lacks sufficient sources.	Referencing mostly follows APA format, with minor errors, and sources are sufficient and authoritative.	Referencing is entirely correct according to APA format, with sufficient and authoritative sources.

🔹 Get Expert Qualitative Psychology Assignment Help with Kaplan University Standard.

Get A Free Quote

University	Kaplan Higher Education Academy
Subject	Qualitative Research in Psychology

Qualitative Research in Psychology Assessment 3 Brief | Kaplan University, Singapore