NUR1203 Assignment Brief

Module Code: NUR1203
Subject Name (likely): Healthcare Ethics and Law
Assignment Type: Individual Essay
Weighting: 50% of overall grade
Word Count: 1,000 words ±10% (900–1,100 words)
Due Date: 28 Feb 2026, Saturday, 11:59 pm
Font: Arial, Calibri, or Times New Roman; size 10–12
Line Spacing: 1.5

Essay (Individual) – 50%

Question

Discuss the case for and against conceiving a child to be a genetic match for a sibling with a life-threatening illness and support the arguments with reference to two relevant ethical theories. Compare the strengths and weaknesses of each ethical theory in your essay.

Ethical theories refer to the following:

Utilitarianism
Deontology
Virtue/Confucian ethics
Principlism (or the four-principles theory)

Format

Length of essay: 1,000 words +/- 10%, i.e. ranging from 900 to 1,100 words

Reference list, appendix, tables and figures are not included in the word count.

Font characteristics: Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman type; size 10, 11 or 12 Line spacing: 1.5 line spacing

Due Date

28 Feb 2026, Saturday before 11:59 pm

Essay guidance

The following provides guidance to developing your essay. It is not meant to be rigid instructions to be followed strictly. The essay must make sense and be coherent. In general, your essay may be organized as follows:

Introduction (approx. 200 words) – Provide the necessary operational definitions in the essay. State the ethical theories to be discussed and the aim of your essay.
Body of essay (approx. 600 words) – Discuss the application of each ethical theory, its strengths and weaknesses. Use appropriate headings and subheadings. Do not use “Body of Essay” as a subheading.
Conclusion (approx. 200 words) – weigh the relative merits and limitations of each ethical theory, conclude whether the arguments therefore weigh towards for or against ‘saviour sibling’. Include any practice implications.

Helpful tips

Support the arguments in your essay with evidence from peer-reviewed journal articles.
Proofread your essay thoroughly to ensure there are no grammatical, spelling or typographical errors.
Use headings and subheadings to signpost your essay.
Use at least 10 references for a 1,000-word essay (“a-reference-for-every-100-word” rule), with fewer than 20% being non-peer-reviewed sources, i.e. websites, newspapers, reports and magazines.
Use proper search database to look for articles, e.g. PubMed (Home – How to use PubMed – Subject Guides at Singapore Institute of Technology) or CINAHL.
Use the APA 7^th referencing style (In Text – APA Citation Style 7th Ed. (other styles too) – Subject Guides at Singapore Institute of Technology).
Use a bibliographic software (Tools (Reference Managers) – APA Citation Style 7th Ed. (other styles too) – Subject Guides at Singapore Institute of Technology) for in-text citation and reference list, so that you will not miss out any reference cited in the main text but not included in the reference list.
References, appendices, tables and figures should be started on separate pages after the main text. You may use the Microsoft Word’s APA style template.
Include word count.
Include page number.
Do not plagiarize any work, as this is a major offence. Use cover page to declare originality.

Late submission

Late submissions for assignment, without penalties, require a written application to be submitted prior to the submission deadline. If the right for a late submission was not granted, late submission will then be accepted until 4 days after the original deadline, with a penalty of 15% per day. Later than 4 days after the original deadline, no marks will be awarded to late submissions.

Write My Assignment

Struggling With NUR1203 Health Ethics and Law Essay at SIT?

Native Singapore Writers Team

100% Plagiarism-Free Essay
Highest Satisfaction Rate
Free Revision
On-Time Delivery

NUR1203 Assignment Marking Rubrics

A, A+	A-, B+	B, B-	C+, C	D, E	F
CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING
An exceptional and excellent essay with clearly defined aims, critically analytical discussions of issues arising from the chosen topic, and thoughtful implications for practice. A broad spectrum of perspectives is considered, resulting in balanced arguments being presented. The essay is analytical, displaying wide knowledge and understanding of the relevant issues, an ability to apply this to practice, deep insight, logic and originality. There is clear evidence of wide and critical reading, and independent thinking.	A very good essay with clearly defined aims, critically analytical discussions of issues arising from the chosen topic, and implications for practice. A range of perspectives are explored, resulting in fairly balanced arguments being presented. The essay is analytical, displaying knowledge and understanding of the relevant issues, an ability to apply this to practice, clear logic and originality. There is clear evidence of critical reading of relevant literature, and independent thinking.	A good essay with defined aims, critically analytical discussions of issues arising from the chosen topic, and some implications for practice. Logical arguments are presented with reference to pertinent perspectives to the topic at hand. The essay shows knowledge and understanding of the relevant issues, an ability to apply this to practice, and clear logic. There is clear evidence of critical reading of the relevant literature.	An average essay that includes stated aims, discussions of issues arising from the chosen topic, and some implications for practice. There are signs of critical analysis, attempts at construction of logical arguments, although largely descriptive in nature. The essay shows perfunctory understanding of the relevant issues, lacks application of theory to practice, and occasionally appears confusing. There is some evidence of critical reading of the relevant literature.	An acceptable essay with stated aims, mostly appropriate discussions of issues arising from the chosen topic, and limited implications for practice. There is limited evidence of critical analysis and logical arguments, with most parts of the essay being descriptive. The essay shows limited understanding of the relevant issues, lacks application of theory to practice, and often appears confusing. There is limited evidence of critical reading of the relevant literature.	A poor essay with incoherent aims, superficial discussions of issues arising from the chosen topic, and almost without implications for practice. The essay is descriptive, with very limited traces of critical analysis or discussion. The essay shows poor understanding of the relevant issues, lacks application of theory to practice, and is incoherent or confusing. There is no evidence of critical reading of the relevant literature.
LAYOUT, STRUCTURE AND COMMUNICATION
An exceptionally well structured and effectively constructed essay. There are clear and appropriate headings and subheadings. The introduction, body and conclusion are coherent and cogently presented. The citation and referencing styles are correct and consistent. The language and grammar reflects an excellent piece of academic writing.	A very well structured and effectively constructed essay. There are clear and appropriate headings and sub-headings. The introduction, body and conclusion are coherent and largely well argued. The citation and referencing styles are mostly correct and consistent. The language and grammar reflects a very good piece of academic writing.	A well-structured and communicated essay. Headings and sub-headings are largely effective. The introduction, body and conclusion are largely coherent and well argued. The citation and referencing styles are mostly correct and consistent. The language and grammar reflects a good piece of academic writing.	A fairly well structured essay. Headings and subheadings can be clearer. The introduction, body and conclusion can be better linked and argued. There are some glaring inconsistencies in citation and referencing styles. The language and grammar reflects average attempt at academic writing.	The essay can be better organized. Headings and subheadings can be better used to signpost the essay. The introduction, body and conclusion are not linked. There are glaring inconsistencies in citation and referencing styles. The language and grammar reflects deserved attempt at academic writing.	A poorly structured essay. Headings and subheadings are lacking. The introduction, body and conclusion are incoherent. The citation and referencing styles are incorrect and inconsistent. The language and grammar reflects poor academic writing.
USE OF REFERENCES
The essay makes excellent use of relevant academic references with limited non-peerreviewed materials.	The essay makes very good use of relevant academic references with limited non peerreviewed materials.	The essay includes relevant academic references, but also nonpeer-reviewed materials.	The essay has some academic references and non-peerreviewed materials.	The essay has some academic references and fairly large amount of nonpeer-reviewed materials.	The essay relies on limited academic references but substantial amount of non-peerreviewed materials.

Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI in Assessment Tasks

These guidelines aim to ensure the ethical and effective use of generative AI tools in this module’s assessment tasks. Whilst the generative AI tools greatly enhance learning, there are inherent limitations of its use. Students are not disallowed to use these tools, but must recognize its limitations while maintaining academic integrity in their assessment tasks.

Types of AI Tools

ChatGPT
Bing
Copilot

And many more that are emerging almost every day. Many new ones allow free trial download, just sufficient for one assessment task. These tools may generate texts, images, videos or presentations.

Research Assistance

Use AI tools to generate ideas for your assignments. Generative AI tools rely on information available for machine learning. In academic work, not all information immediately becomes publicly available. You must still turn to credible sources, such as most recently published peer-reviewed journal articles and textbooks for accurate and reliable information.
Verify the accuracy of the information provided by AI tools through credible sources, as mentioned, which include journal articles and textbooks.

Idea Generation

Use AI tools to brainstorm topics, questions, and potential solutions for discussion board posts, class debates, and group presentations.
Use AI-generated content as a starting point to develop your own unique insights and arguments. Ultimately, you want to be assessed for your understanding and ability to synthesize current knowledge, not the often-outdated information in AI-generated content.

Writing Support

Employ AI tools for grammar and style suggestions to improve the clarity and readability of your writing. However you must verify that your intended meaning has not been altered.
Consult Centre for Professional Communication if needed.

Enhancing Presentation

Leverage on AI tools to create visual aids, such as slides and infographics, to support your presentations.
Use AI to generate summaries or key points for your presentations, ensuring you cover

all essential aspects. Verify, however, again the accuracy of the summary and that the meaning has not been altered.

Learning and Understanding

Use AI to explain complex concepts and provide additional examples to enhance your understanding of the course material.
Engage with AI tools to simulate debates or discussions (e.g. potential counterarguments to your arguments), helping you prepare for class interactions (e.g. rebuttals).

Plagiarism

Do not submit AI-generated content as your own work. Always ensure that your submissions are original and properly cited. Do not attempt to risk or challenge the rigour of plagiarism-detector software; the penalty is grave. If you attract a written warning for plagiarism, you may not receive upon graduation a Certificate of Good Conduct, which is necessary for registration with your professional boards (e.g. Allied Health Professions Council).

Over-Reliance

Do not rely solely on AI tools for completing your assessment tasks. Use them as supplementary learning tools, not replacements for your own independent critical thinking and analysis. To develop deep learning, you must engage your professors, search and read current academic literature (i.e. journal articles, textbooks) and reflect on your learning experience.
Do not accept AI-generated content without critical evaluation. Always cross-check facts and ensure the information is accurate and relevant.

Confidentiality

Do not input sensitive or confidential information (e.g. names of yourself or your friends) into AI tools, especially when discussing real-life cases or patient information.
Be mindful of data privacy and security when using AI tools.

If you have any questions or need further clarification, please contact your professor.

Developed using Microsoft Bing Copilot suggested outputs.

Get Professional Support for Your NUR1203 Assignment

Get A Free Quote

University	Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT)
Subject	NUR1203 Health Ethics and Law

NUR1203 Health Ethics and Law Assignment Brief 2026 | SIT, Singapore