CriterionNN (Fail)PA (Pass)CR (Credit)DI (Distinction)HD (High Distinction)
Market View and Summary ReportDepth and
breadth of
content.
Application of
relevant
theory
(40%)
  • Not addressing
    the assessment requirements.
  • Fail to address
    the core concepts/ideas
    /theories
  • Little or no
    demonstration of
    reading/

research

relevant to the
assessment.

  • Application is
    inappropriate and wrong
  • Analysis is supported by
    limited integration of
    concepts/ ideas/
    theories
  • Limited use of sources
    to support analysis
  • Sources lack currency,
    relevance or credibility
  • Application is unclear
    and unspecific
  • Some understanding of
    core concepts/ ideas/
    theories
  • Use of sources is
    discriminatory to support
    analysis
  • General application
  • Good understanding and
    integration of core
    concepts/ ideas/ theories
  • The wide use

of sources to
support analysis

  • Sources are current,
    relevant and credible
  • Some limitations and
    implications

are discussed
in conclusions

  • Excellent understanding of core
    concepts/ ideas/ theories
  • Excellent independent research
    beyond what is provided/ guided
    in the course
  • Core concepts/ ideas/ theories
    are well integrated, compared
    and contrasted
  • A constructive critique of key
    theories
  • Conclusions are strong and
    offer important implications
Quality of
data/
information
used
(40%)
  • No data, real case or
    current affair are
    collected for analysis
  • No use of market
    language and
    conventions
  • No consistency

/link in
information before &
after simulation.

  • Data, real

cases or
current affairs used are
primarily

based in listed
resources

in the course

  • Limited use of market
    language and
    conventions
  • Weak consistency

/link in
information before &
after simulation

  • Some independent
    collection of data, real
    cases or current affairs,
    but lack relevancy and
    creditability
  • General use

of market
language and
conventions

  • Moderate consistency/
    link in information before
    & after simulation
  • Independent collection of a
    wide range of relevant and
    credible data, real cases
    and current affairs
  • Good use of market
    language and conventions
  • Good consistency

/link in
information before & after
simulation

  • Excellent use of relevant, and
    credible data, real cases and
    current affairs that support
    consistent analysis
  • A wide range of market
    language and conventions are
    used
  • Strong consistency

/link in
information before & after
simulation

Summary reportStructure
(10%)
  • No logical structure
  • Poor flow
  • Poor structure
  • Lack of logical or
    meaningful flow
  • Generally structured and
    logical flow but not
    strong
  • Key points are not well
    connected
  • Good structure and logical
    flow
  • Key points are well
    connected
    • Excellent structure and flow

Address content in

video clip

Presentation
& Clarity
(10%)
  • Expression and
    meaning are unclear
  • Frequent grammatical
    errors
  • Harvard referencing is
    required
  • Expression and
    meaning are
    inconsistent and
    sometimes unclear
  • Notable grammatical
    errors
  • Harvard referencing is
    required
  • Expression and
    meaning are generally
    clear
  • Some grammatical
    errors
  • Harvard referencing is
    required
  • Good expression and
    meaning
  • Minor grammatical errors
  • Close to professional
    analyst standard
  • Harvard referencing

is
required

  • Excellent expression and
    meaning specific to the
    discipline
  • Little or no grammatical and
    spelling errors
  • At professional analyst standard
  • Harvard referencing is required
Overall grade (marks):
Grade Descriptions:
NN indicates unsatisfactory performance, evidence of lack of understanding of course materials/requirements, and/or inadequate, or incomplete depth and breadth of analysis and a
lack of relevance.
PA indicates work at or just above minimum standard; tends to be more descriptive than analytical, and where arguments are not strongly supported.
CR indicates above-average work demonstrating an an understanding of the concepts and their application. Good research and application.
DI indicates superior work featuring originality, solid research, good critical analysis, and well-substantiated argument.
HD indicates outstanding work featuring originality, excellent critical analysis, detailed research and comprehensive coverage of relevant issues. Presented at professional analyst
standard.

IF Additional Information:

Students must demonstrate their understanding and application of the course materials to analyze and explain the factors that determine the historical movement of AUD/USD exchange rate and predict what the rate will be on 1 December 2019. The specific requirements are as follows:

Tasks/Objectives

  • (1) Discuss using on Purchasing Power Parity.
  • (2) Discuss using on Interest Rate Parity.
  • (3) Discuss using the five factors in the parts supply and demand model.
  • (4) Develop your own theoretical model by combining any factors that you deem as important in determining the above exchange rate.
  • (5) Discuss any qualitative and quantitative data that may affect the determination of the above exchange rate based on Task 4.
  • (6) Comments and Conclusions – compare and contrast Task 1-5. For Task 1-4, you must demonstrate your understanding of the theories in Topics 1 – 6 and the application of these theories in determining the exchange rate. You may use data and calculations in your discussions. You must provide a brief summary at the end of each task.

NOTES FROM Lecturer:
Sensitivity analysis does 1 or 2 enuff.

  • Task 1 – PPP does 2 scenario analysis then compare. Can either use the PPP model or regression?
  • Task 1-4 = brief the theory, pro & cons for the theory. (MUST HAVE) All the predicted rate will be different.
  • Task 3 = All 5 factors from the course notes, every factor will have a predicted movement on SSDD curve. (Means got 5 individual movement) The overall effect will strengthen or weaken AUD (Don’t give numbers).
  • Task 4 = Community prices for AUD (MUST DO) plus 2 or 3 more factors then combine it and predict a movement on the exchange rate. Try to get a journal article support the factors u use. Doesn’t matter if they use on different currency as long as the factor same it’s alright.
  • Task 5 – Discuss mainly on qualitative because all factors are quantitative. 1 qualitative factor, Impending trade war. Give 2 or more factors. 2 quantitative , 2 quantitative.
  • Task 6 – Critical analysis on all the 4 and choose the best, and why?

Additional: Mid rates means no commission taken by banks thru bid-offer

Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your college/ university Assignments.

Submit Assignment

Add More