| University | Temasek Polytechnic (TP) |
| Subject | AVET204 Animal Nutrition Care & Behaviour |
AVET204 Assignment Brief
This assignment comprises two parts, one individual component (5%) and one group component (15%) each focusing on critical aspects of nutritional planning.
Part 1 focuses on building your foundational skills in determining dietary energy needs and diet selection. These principles will be further applied in
Part 2, where you will work collaboratively to analyse and justify diet choices for specific medical conditions for a patient.
Part 1: Determining the Daily Energy Requirement (Individual Assignment 5%):
Each student will be randomly assigned with a patient (Life stage, weight will be provided on POLITEMALL). Using patient information and the table below:
- Calculate the Daily Energy Requirement (DER) of your patient using Resting Energy Requirement – RER: 70 x (BW kg)75
- Recommend ONE commercial diet suitable for the assigned life stage and patient. Include your nutrition labels.
| Known life stage and corresponding factors used to estimate daily energy needs for dogs | |
| Puppy 0-4 Months | = 3.0 x RER |
| Adult, neutered | = 1.6 x RER |
| Weight Loss | = 1.0 x RER for ideal weight |
| Lactating | = 4.0 x RER |
Justify the recommendation by showing:
- Energy content of the diet (kcal/cup, kcal/can, etc.)
- How your choice of diet meets the calculated requirements
Submit a report with:
- The name and nutrition label of commercial diet
- All calculations clearly shown
- Feeding recommendations for your patient
Format and submission guide
Your report should be no longer than 1 A4 page (excluding cover page, declarations and reference list) in PDF format.
Font should be Calibri or Arial, with font size 12 and 1.5 line spacing.
AI Usage Policy for This Assignment
You may use AI tools to help you understand the topic or review background information, but you must write all answers and ideas by yourself. Do not copy or include any text, diagram, or image created by AI in your submission.
Individual Assignment File Name [StudentID_IndividualAssignment]
Please ensure that you have included a declaration of originality for the individual assignment and submit a soft copy of your assignment on POLITEMall. Please note that all submissions will be scanned by SafeAssign Plagiarism software.
Due date: 3 Mar 2026, 2359H
Marking rubrics
| Criteria | |
| Accuracy of
Calculations (RER & DER) |
2 — Correct formula and factors used; calculations accurate and clearly shown
1 — Minor calculation or rounding errors 0 — Incorrect or missing calculations |
| Diet Selection and
Appropriateness |
1 — Diet suitable for life stage and condition
0.5 — Diet somewhat suitable; minor mismatch 0 — Diet not suitable or missing |
| Justification and Energy Content | 1 — Energy content stated; clear explanation of how it meets DER
0.5 — Energy content provided but weak or unclear explanation 0 — Missing or inaccurate energy content; no justification |
| Diet Label and Reference | 1 — Diet name and label clearly shown; reliable source cite (APA)
0.5 — Diet name shown but incomplete label or missing source 0 — Diet name or label missing entirely |
Part 2 : Feed Analysis (Group Assignment 15%)
In groups of 5-6, you will investigate and analyze a prescription diet and compare it with a maintenance diet from the same brand (Hill’s).
Instructions
- Form a group of 5-6 students; you may form your own group.
- Submit your groupings through email to liamchri@tp.edu.sg by 3rd Feb 2026. Students who fail to form a group by the dateline will be assigned to a group at random.
For the assigned prescription diet, ensure that the comparison is made with a maintenance adult diet from the same brand. Please refer to the table below for the possible choices.
| Prescriptio | n Diet |
| Royal Canin | Hill’s |
| Renal | K/D |
| Gastrointestinal | I/D |
| Urinary S/O | C/D |
Research • Select ONE common medical condition for which the prescribed diet is indicated.
- Explain how and why the diet is beneficial in managing these conditions. Support your explanation with evidence from credible sources, cited in APA format.
Nutritional Comparison
- Compare the nutrient profile of the prescribed diet with that of a standard maintenance diet of your choice. (include your nutrition labels)
- Present the differences in a comparative report table and highlight why these nutritional differences are important in relation to the medical conditions identified compared to a standard maintenance diet.
Client Handout
- Include a client friendly infographic or handout explaining the key points in simple terms. Include:
- The condition and why diet matters
- Key dietary features (what the food helps with and how)
- Simple feeding tips or advice (e.g., water intake, consistency, transition)
Format and submission guide
Your report should be no longer than 5 A4 pages (excluding cover page, declarations and reference list).
Font should be Calibri or Arial, with font size 12 and 1.5 line spacing.
You must include at least five (5) references from reputable sources with in-text citations (where appropriate) and a complete reference list according to APA referencing style. Incomplete or erroneous referencing will be penalised.
Group Assignment File Name: [Group No_AssignedDiet]
Please ensure that you have included a declaration of originality for the group assignment and submit a soft copy of your assignment on POLITEMall. Please note that all submissions will be scanned by SafeAssign Plagiarism software.
Only ONE group assignment needs to be submitted per group.
Peer Appraisal
Peer appraisal is compulsory and will be conducted for this group work through Feedback fruits on Politemall which will be posted after group names have been submitted.
AI Usage Policy for This Assignment
You may use AI tools to help you understand the topic or review background information, but you must write all answers and ideas by yourself. Do not copy or include any text, diagram, or image created by AI in your submission.
Due date: 3 Mar 2026, 2359H
Resources for Students
- https://www-bsavalibrary-tp-library.idm.oclc.org/
- APA reference guide on TP library website: https://tp.libguides.com/apa
- Lecture notes
Marking Rubrics
| Criteria | |
| Report Content | 4 — All required sections are fully completed. Information is accurate, detailed, and clearly explains how and why the prescribed diet benefits the selected medical condition. Nutritional comparison table is clear, complete, and effectively highlights meaningful differences and their clinical importance.
3 – All sections included with mostly accurate and relevant information. Explanations are clear but may lack some depth or detail. Comparison table is present and understandable, with minor gaps. 2 — Most sections completed but with noticeable gaps in explanation or clarity. Some inaccuracies present. Nutritional comparison may be incomplete, basic, or not clearly linked to the medical condition. 1 – Several sections incomplete or poorly explained. Multiple factual errors or weak understanding of how the diet relates to the condition. Comparison table missing key information or unclear. 0 — Report largely incomplete, inaccurate, or missing required sections. Very limited or irrelevant content. |
| Research Quality | 3 — Research is thorough, using credible sources to support claims.
2- The research is adequate, with some detailed evidence. 1- Limited research is present. Sources or evidence lack credibility or detail. |
| Client handout | 4 – Demonstrates strong accuracy, relevance, and completeness. Information is clearly translated into client-friendly language with an effective visual/infographic design. Key dietary features and practical feeding advice are well explained and easy to understand
3—Content is accurate and appropriate with only minor gaps. Language is mostly client-friendly and visuals are clear. Key points are explained but may lack some detail or polish 2— Generally correct but with noticeable gaps in clarity, detail, or organization. Language may be somewhat technical or visuals only moderately helpful. Practical advice may be incomplete. 1— Explanations are unclear, incomplete, or overly technical. Important points are missing, and visual organisation is weak. Limited usefulness for client education. |
| 0— Contains major misunderstandings or incorrect information, or shows minimal effort. Handout is not suitable for client education. | |
| Organisation | 2— Clear structure, appropriate headings used, professional writing, easy to follow, no error in formatting.
1— Mostly clear structure, minor formatting (E.g. Incorrect fonts or font size, headings, line spacing)/grammatical errors. 0— Disorganised or no clear organisation, difficult to follow, missing or unclear headings |
| References and
citation |
2— Appropriate citation and APA style referencing from reliable sources all the time
1— Appropriate citation and APA style referencing from reliable sources occasionally 0— No citation and references provided |
Peer Appraisal
| Average Score | 0 – < 2.5 | 2.5 – < 3.5 | 3.5 -5 |
| Multiplier to total group score | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1 |
Struggling With AVET204 Animal Nutrition Assignment at TP?
Native Singapore Writers Team
- 100% Plagiarism-Free Essay
- Highest Satisfaction Rate
- Free Revision
- On-Time Delivery
Many Temasek Polytechnic students find AVET204 challenging because Part 1 and Part 2 very Complicate. That’s why students choose Singapore Assignment Help for structured and academically accurate nutrition assignment help aligned with TP marking rubrics. We provide 100% human-written, plagiarism-free veterinary assignments with clear calculations, proper nutrition label analysis, and strong clinical justification. Order our TP assignment writing service today and review our temasek polytechnic assignment samples to see the quality and accuracy we consistently deliver.
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your college/ university Assignments.
- NUR3506 Translation of Evidence into Practice Assessment 3, 2026 | NUS
- NUR3507 Clinical Practice Development Project Assignment Brief 2026 | NUS
- EGE202 Application Programming Assessment Project 2 2026 | Nanyang Polytechnic
- Law and the Arts Assessment 1 Essay Question 2026 | UAS
- ICT 162 Object Oriented Programming Tutor-Marked Assignment January 2026 | SUSS
- ICT233 Data Programming Tutor-Marked Assignment January 2026 | SUSS
- EE4524 Design of Clean Energy System Assignment Questions 2026 | NTU
- PSY107 Introduction to Psychology 1 Tutor-Marked Assignment 02 2026
- BPM213 Procurement Management Tutor-Marked Assignment One 2026 | SUSS
- ICT330 Database Management Systems Tutor-Marked Assignment Questions 2026