HR9516 HRM Essentials Assignment – Well-Being at IMH and Personal Reflection with Nestlé, Singapore

Guidance for this assessment

1. In week 2 of semester, you will be assigned a project brief. Working as a team you will research the assigned case study organisation (your “client”) and relevant literature, as directed via the seminar programme. Your team will present your recommendations on how best to address the project brief via a 15-minute presentation to your tutor in your week 8 seminar. Your team leader should then submit your presentation slides and speaker notes via Blackboard.
2. You should also write an academic essay of 2,500 words, split into the two following sections:a. Select one topic you have studied on the module (e.g. employer branding, talent management, employment relations, well-being). Critically analyse, using academic literature, how and why the topic is implemented by front-line managers in a case study organisation. This section should be approximately 1,500 words of the total.i. I want to focus on well-being and company I choose is the Institute of Mental Health(IMH)b. Following Gibbs’ reflective cycle, reflect on what you have learned throughout the module and how what you have learned will benefit your future career. This should mention specific skills and knowledge with examples from the module of how you developed these and supporting academic references. This section should be approximately 1,000 words of the total.ii. Company given is Nestle.

Rubric – Grading criteria for the Assessment (TEAM PRESENTATION)

Assessment Guidance Session

Detailed assessment guidance will be given in Week 6 seminar and the Week 12 lecture as well as throughout the seminar programme.  The Seminar/lecture will provide advice on

(i) what an excellent essay and reflection looks like (Week 6 seminar)

(ii) how to structure your essay (week 12 lecture/recorded assessment guidance)

(iii) how to reflect on what you have learned on the module (week 12 lecture)

(iv) how the assessment will be graded against the rubric

You are reminded that recorded assessment guidance will be provided on the eLP Blackboard site for this module after Week 1 lecture.

Use of Generative AI within this Assessment

In alignment with Northumbria University’s Academic Regulations for Taught Awards (ARTA), section 1.2, you are reminded that “In all assessed work students should take care to ensure that the work presented is their own and that it fully acknowledges the work and opinions of others”.

The Northumbria Assessment Regulations for Taught Awards (ARTA) which contain the Regulations and procedures applying to cheating, plagiarism, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems, and other forms of academic misconduct can be found here

Academic Regulations

You should note that:

• Word count includes the in-text references and citations but excludes tables (where these are used appropriately), reference list and appendices. Non-compliance with the word limit will result in a penalty being applied in accordance with the University Word Limit Policy which can be found here.
• Submission deadline: Work must be submitted by the dates specified. Where work is submitted after the deadline, without prior approval, a penalty will normally apply.  For guidance on the late submission of coursework, please see here.  For coursework submitted:
  • Up to 1 working day (24 hours) after the published hand-in deadline without approval, 10% of the total marks available for the assessment (i.e.100%) shall be deducted from the assessment mark
  • Over 1 working day (over 24 hours) after the published submission deadline without approval, all 100% will be deducted. That is a 0% will be recorded but will normally be eligible for referral except where the University is prevented from doing so by a PSRB requirement.

Please see the Blackboard eLP for further details of the University Assessment Regulations.