Assignment Details:

Criterion		NN (Fail)	PA (Pass)	CR (Credit)	DI (Distinction)	HD (High Distinction)
Market View and Summary Report	Depth and breadth of content. Application of relevant theory(40%)	Not addressing the assessment requirements. Fail to address the core concepts/ideas/theories Little or no demonstration of reading/ research relevant to the assessment. Application is inappropriate and wrong	Analysis is supported by limited integration of concepts/ ideas/theories Limited use of sources to support analysis Sources lack currency,relevance or credibility Application is unclear and unspecific	Some understanding of core concepts/ ideas/theories Use of sources is discriminatory to support analysis General application	Good understanding and integration of core concepts/ ideas/ theories The wide use of sources to support analysis Sources are current, relevant and credible Some limitations and implications are discussed in conclusions	Excellent understanding of core concepts/ ideas/ theories Excellent independent research beyond what is provided/ guided in the course Core concepts/ ideas/ theories are well integrated, compared and contrasted A constructive critique of key theories Conclusions are strong and offer important implications
Market View and Summary Report	Quality of data/informationused(40%)	No data, real case or current affair are collected for analysis No use of market language and conventions No consistency/link ininformation before & after simulation.	Data, realcases or current affairs used are primarily based in listedb resources in the course Limited use of market language and conventions Weak consistency/link in information before & after simulation	Some independent collection of data, real cases or current affairs, but lack relevancy and creditability General use of market language and conventions Moderate consistency/link in information before & after simulation	Independent collection of a wide range of relevant and credible data, real cases and current affairs Good use of market language and conventions Good consistenc link in information before & after simulation	Excellent use of relevant, and credible data, real cases and current affairs that support consistent analysis A wide range of market language and conventions are used Strong consistency link in information before & after simulation
Summary report	Structure(10%)	No logical structure Poor flow	Poor structure Lack of logical or meaningful flow	Generally structured and logical flow but not strong Key points are not well connected	Good structure and logical flow Key points are well connected	Excellent structure and flow Address content in video clip
Summary report	Presentation & Clarity(10%)	Expression and meaning are unclear Frequent grammatical errors Harvard referencing is required	Expression and meaning are inconsistent and sometimes unclear Notable grammatical errors Harvard referencing is required	Expression and meaning are generally clear Some grammatical errors Harvard referencing is required	Good expression and meaning Minor grammatical errors Close to professional analyst standard Harvard referencing is required	Excellent expression and meaning specific to the discipline Little or no grammatical and spelling errors At professional analyst standard Harvard referencing is required
Overall grade (marks):

Grade Descriptions:
NN indicates unsatisfactory performance, evidence of lack of understanding of course materials/requirements, and/or inadequate, or incomplete depth and breadth of analysis and a lack of relevance.
PA indicates work at or just above minimum standard; tends to be more descriptive than analytical, and where arguments are not strongly supported.
CR indicates above-average work demonstrating an understanding of the concepts and their application. Good research and application.
DI indicates superior work featuring originality, solid research, good critical analysis, and well-substantiated argument.
HD indicates outstanding work featuring originality, excellent critical analysis, detailed research and comprehensive coverage of relevant issues. Presented at professional analyst
standard.

Students must demonstrate their understanding and application of the course materials to analyze and explain the factors that determine the historical movement of AUD/USD exchange rate and predict what the rate will be on 1 December 2019. The specific requirements are as follows:

IF Additional Information:

Tasks/Objectives

(1) Discuss using on Purchasing Power Parity.
(2) Discuss using on Interest Rate Parity.
(3) Discuss using the five factors in the parts supply and demand model.
(4) Develop your own theoretical model by combining any factors that you deem as important in determining the above exchange rate.
(5) Discuss any qualitative and quantitative data that may affect the determination of the above exchange rate based on Task 4.
(6) Comments and Conclusions – compare and contrast Task 1-5. For Task 1-4, you must demonstrate your understanding of the theories in Topics 1 – 6 and the application of these theories in determining the exchange rate. You may use data and calculations in your discussions. You must provide a brief summary at the end of each task.

NOTES FROM Lecturer:
Sensitivity analysis does 1 or 2 enuff.

Task 1 – PPP does 2 scenario analysis then compare. Can either use the PPP model or regression?
Task 1-4 = brief the theory, pro & cons for the theory. (MUST HAVE) All the predicted rate will be different.
Task 3 = All 5 factors from the course notes, every factor will have a predicted movement on SSDD curve. (Means got 5 individual movement) The overall effect will strengthen or weaken AUD (Don’t give numbers).
Task 4 = Community prices for AUD (MUST DO) plus 2 or 3 more factors then combine it and predict a movement on the exchange rate. Try to get a journal article support the factors u use. Doesn’t matter if they use on different currency as long as the factor same it’s alright.
Task 5 – Discuss mainly on qualitative because all factors are quantitative. 1 qualitative factor, Impending trade war. Give 2 or more factors. 2 quantitative , 2 quantitative.
Task 6 – Critical analysis on all the 4 and choose the best, and why?

Additional: Mid rates means no commission taken by banks thru bid-offer

Write My Assignment

Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments

Native Singapore Writers Team

100% Plagiarism-Free Essay
Highest Satisfaction Rate
Free Revision
On-Time Delivery

BAFI1019 International Finance (Simulation and Analysis)- NN indicates unsatisfactory performance, evidence of lack of understanding of course materials/requirements, Singapore

Assignment Details:

IF Additional Information:

Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments

Ask Your Homework Today!