University | Murdoch University (MU) |
Subject | PSY391: Individual Differences and Performance |
There are three major questions to be answered as part this assignment.
1. Using your PSY391 peers as a point of comparison, what do your scores on the 120-item IPIP by Maples et al. (2014) suggest about the five major trait domains of your personality?
When answering this question, please address the following as part of your answer:
• Provide a standardised statistical indicator (e.g., a Z score) for each of your five domain scores that allows you to describe how much higher, lower, or approximately average you are on each trait domain in comparison to your PSY391 peers.
Hint: You can treat the PSY391 peer data as population data when calculating your Z score. A formula to calculate population Z scores can be easily googled.
• Based on your IPIP scores, describe what traits for each domain would be more or less characteristic of you in comparison to your peers in the unit.
• Based on your IPIP scores and their implications for your personality traits described above, how accurately does this correspond with how you see yourself in comparison to your peers? Provide examples for each domain to substantiate your answer.
• Provide a Figure or Figures in your Appendix that demonstrates the distribution of the PSY391 cohort on each domain, and where your score sits on the distribution for each domain.
2. Based on findings from published academic literature, what do your scores on the five personality trait domains suggest about your predicted academic performance at university?
When answering this question, please address the following as part of your answer:
• Provide a concise summary of the academic literature that has addressed the five personality domains and their expected relationships with tertiary academic performance.
• Based on your perceptions of your academic performance, do your IPIP results support the predicted relationships between personality traits and academic performance?
Provide examples to substantiate your answer for the relevant trait domains.
3. What validity considerations are important when looking at the relationship between your personality domain scores and their predictions about your academic performance? When answering this question, please address the following as part of your answer:
• What aspects of validity may impede or strengthen the accuracy of your trait domain scores as predictors of academic performance? Provide examples to substantiate how these aspects of validity may be directly relevant to the accuracy of these relationships
Buy Custom Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades
Need PSY391: Individual Differences and Performance Assignment help? Singapore Assignment Help’s team of dedicated professionals is always ready to assist you with your assignments at an affordable price. Our experts produce top-notch content that meets the highest academic standards, ensuring that you get a high rank in your class.
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your college/ university Assignments.
- Mobile Learning App Evaluation Report Assignment: Usability, Design, and Learning Outcome Analysis
- CTA Psychotherapy Intervention Essay Assignment: Sheila Case Study on Managing Anxiety and Marital Stress
- DSM500 Machine Learning Project Proposal: Retail Sales Forecasting with Time Series Models
- Project Management Assignment 2: The Shard UK Case Study on Risk & Stakeholder Strategies in Construction Projects
- CSIT121 Banking Application Assignment: OOP-Based Customer & Account Management System in Python
- PSB333MAE Assignment 1 Report: Structural Analysis & Optimisation Using SolidWorks and Direct Stiffness Method
- Economics Assignment Questions: Factors of Production, Demand Behavior & Global Coffee Market
- GSGM 7223 Strategic Transformation Assignment: Global Foods Ltd Case Study on Change Management and Digital Innovation
- PAC Research Proposal Report Assignment 1: Accounting and Finance Topics
- 7025CL Management Report Assignment: Investment Appraisal and Cash Budgeting – A Financial Feasibility Study for Gamiquest Corporation