AVET205 Practical Assignment

weight – 30%
marks –30 marks
Title: A Journey Through My Rat’s Body

This Practical Assignment is a Poster Design which contributes 30% to your total grade for the subject. It is to be completed individually.

Learning Outcomes

By the end of this assignment, students should be able to:

apply and demonstrate understanding of anatomy and physiology by describing the structure and function of two body systems
compare one key organ from the rat to its equivalent in another vertebrate (ruminant, bird or fish)

Instructions

1. Select two systems you explored during your rat dissection. You should include the following:
o One from: Digestive or urinary system, AND
o One from: Circulatory, respiratory, nervous, or reproductive system

2. Create your journey by imagining you are a tiny explorer travelling through your dissected rat’s body, following the pathway of that system.
o You might follow a drop of blood, a piece of food, a nerve impulse, or even a sperm cell to name a few examples.

3. As you travel, describe the journey in a creative but scientifically accurate way.

4. Mention at least 3 major structures in each system and explain briefly what happens at each stop (structure + function).

5. Along your journey, pause to compare one key organ or structure from your rat to that of either a ruminant, bird, or fish.
o Explain briefly how that organ may differ in structure, how these differences relate to diet, environment or lifestyle, and add an adaptation or physiological advantage of the other animal owing to this difference.

6. At the end of the poster, reflect (using not more than 100 words) on this practical dissection with the help of any ONE of the following questions:
o What are some challenges you have faced during the dissection, and how have you overcome it?
o What anatomical structures were most challenging to identify or isolate? Why?
o Did the dissection help clarify how certain body systems are connected or function together? Elaborate.
o What unexpected findings or variations did you notice during the dissection?o How might anatomical variations impact clinical procedures or surgeries?
o How did hands-on dissection change your understanding compared to textbook learning or models?
o Were there any safety or ethical concerns during the dissection? How were they addressed?

7. You are permitted to submit a maximum of two-page A4 format which includes o Labelled diagrams (hand-drawn or referenced) o Pictures from rat dissection

Submission Details:

File Name: [Student name_Admin Number]
Format: Submit your A4 two-page poster in either MS Word or PDF format. Orientation can be either landscape or portrait.
References: Include at least two (2) references from scientific journals, using APA in text citation You may refer to the following guide on APA in text citation: https://tp.libguides.com/apa/intext
Submission Portal: Upload your assignment to BrightSpace (LMS) POLITEMall at: Assessment → Assignments → VAP Practical Assignment
Due date: 17 January 2026 (Saturday), 23:59
Late Submission Penalty: Submissions received after the deadline will incur a 20% penalty. Submissions received 6 or more working days late will not be graded and will be given ‘0’ marks.
AI Usage Policy:
To guide students clearly on when and how they may use AI tools in this assignment, the school is adopting the AIAS (AI Assistance Spectrum) framework. The permitted level of AI assistance for this assignment is AIAS Level B- AI use allowed with care.
You can use AI tools to help you with writing, brainstorming, or improving your work. Do not copy everything directly from AI. Make sure the information is correct and written in your own words.
Declaration of Originality and Turnitin: Fill up and attach the Declaration of Originality for Individual Assignment and Declaration of use of Generative A.I.(see Pg 4 and 5) Take note of Plagiarism Policy – refer to Study Guide on Academic Integrity.

Resources for Students

1. Reference book: Aspinall, V., O’Reilly, M. & Cappello, M. (2004). Introduction to veterinary anatomy and physiology. Edinburgh, Scotland: Butterworth-Heinemann.

2. E-resources (E-books, E-journals, Databases, License-free images)

3. TP LibGuides by Diploma Course

4. BSAVA library- https://www-bsavalibrary-com.tp-idm.oclc.org/

5. JOVE- https://for.edu.sg/tp-jove

6. Lecture notes

Write My Assignment

🔹 Struggling with AVET205 Veterinary Anatomy & Physiology Practical Assignment?

Native Singapore Writers Team

100% Plagiarism-Free Essay
Highest Satisfaction Rate
Free Revision
On-Time Delivery

AVET205 Assessment Rubric

(30% weightage)

Detailed Marking Criteria:

Criteria	Excellent (5-6)	Good (4)	Satisfactory (3)	Needs Improvement (0-2 Marks)
Anatomical accuracy	All relevant anatomical features from two systems are correctly identified and explained in depth. Normal function is clearly articulated.	Most key features from two systems identified with minor errors. Normal function mostly clear.	Some features identified from one system only, with several inaccuracies. Explanation of function is basic or incomplete.	Few or incorrect features identified. Limited or no explanation of normal function.
Comparative Organ Analysis	Comparison is detailed and biologically accurate. Connections to diet/environment/lifestyle are logical and well-explained. Adaptation or advantage is clearly described and well-justified.	Comparison is accurate with minor omissions or simplifications. Relationship to diet/environment/lifestyle is explained adequately. Adaptation is relevant but may lack justifications.	Comparison includes some inaccuracies or lacks detail. Links to diet/environment/lifestyle are weak or unclear. Adaptation is mentioned but not explained.	Comparison is inaccurate or missing. No clear connection to diet/environment/lifestyle. Adaptation or advantage not identified or incorrect.
Use of diagrams	Diagrams are highly accurate, detailed, and clearly labeled. Images are directly relevant to the organ studied and strongly enhance understanding of anatomy and function. Visuals are presented neatly and integrated seamlessly with written explanations.	Diagrams are accurate and relevant, with mostly correct labeling and clear presentation. Visuals support the explanation and understanding of the organ’s structure and function.	Diagrams are partially accurate or incomplete. Some labeling or clarity issues limit their effectiveness. Visuals add some support to understanding but are not well integrated with the explanation.	Diagrams are unclear, inaccurate, or missing. Visuals do not contribute meaningfully to understanding of anatomy or are unrelated to the content.
Creativity and Presentation Style	Poster is visually engaging, original, and highly effective in communicating scientific ideas. Layout is clear and logical, with balanced visuals and concise text. Creative elements enhance understanding of the comparison.	Poster is clear, organized, and visually appealing. Some creativity shown in design and layout, with visuals that support understanding.	Poster shows basic effort and organization but lacks visual impact or creative elements. Information may be textheavy or cluttered.	Poster is unclear, disorganized, or visually unappealing. Difficult to read or understand; creativity and effort are minimal.
Criteria		Good (3)	Satisfactory (2)	Needs Improvement (1-0 Marks)
Reflection		Reflection is thoughtful, insightful, and clearly connects anatomical structure to function.	Reflection shows basic understanding with limited depth or connection between anatomy and function.	Reflection is minimal or missing. Shows little or no understanding of how anatomy relates to function or fails to identify a meaningful insight.
Citations		Appropriate citation and APA style referencing from reliable sources all of the time.	Most sources are reliable and correctly cited in APA style.	References and citations show inconsistent or incorrect APA formatting. Some sources are unreliable or missing.

Diploma in Applied Science AY2025/2026

[Title of Assignment]

Submitted By

[Name of student]

Class:

Declaration of Originality

I am the originator of this work and I have appropriately acknowledged all other original sources used as my reference for this work.

I understand that Plagiarism is the act of taking and using the whole or any part of another person’s work, including work generated by AI, and presenting it as my own.

I understand that Plagiarism is an academic offence

and if I am found to have committed or abetted the offence of plagiarism in relation to this submitted work, disciplinary action will be enforced.

Student’s Signature: ____________________

Declaration on the use of Generative AI tools for assignments

Describe how you have used Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT or Dall.E-2 in your assignment.

Share the link to the conversations you had with the AI tool (i.e., the prompts you used and the responses you get from the AI tool).

How do you indicate the reference?

The content generated by AI tools are not retrievable except by the user who generated them, so they are considered non-recoverable sources. Although non-recoverable data or quotations in APA Style papers are usually cited as personal communications, with ChatGPTgenerated text there is no person communicating. Quoting text from ChatGPT chat is therefore more like sharing the output of an algorithm, with a reference list entry and the corresponding in-text citation.

According to the official APA Style site, ChatGPT references should be cited as: E.g. OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (Feb 13 version) [Large language model].

https://chat.openai.com/chat

Note: The information in parentheses refers to the update or revision date of the model used. Refer to the release notes in the ChatGPT application. To locate the release notes, click the ? button at the bottom right corner of the ChatGPT interface. A window will pop up as shown below that points you to the release notes.

Important Note:

Do not copy answers produced by the AI tool in totality as it is considered as plagiarism.
Do not rely on any information produced by the AI tool blindly. You should always verify the answer with other sources. Do not assume that these answers provided by the AI tool are correct.
To achieve quality outputs from the AI tool, you should provide good prompt that is clear and specific.

Be precise and provide context. Avoid asking open-ended questions.

🔹 Order Your S1519C VAP Practical Assignment On Time at Temasek Polytechnic

Get A Free Quote

University	Temasek Polytechnic (TP)
Subject	AVET205 Veterinary Anatomy & Physiology

AVET205 Veterinary Anatomy & Physiology (VAP) Practical Assignment 2026, Singapore