Question 2.1
A 24-year old male was arrested for possessing one hundred (100) illicitly made red tablets suspected to contain controlled drug(s). The exhibit was sent to a forensic laboratory for analysis and the report issued was as follows:
The exhibit was found to be one hundred (100) red tablets. The weight of the exhibit was not less than 31.96 grams. A hypergeometric sampling plan was used in the analysis. The analysis shows that at least 90% of the tablets contain ethylene, at a confidence level of 99%.
Ethylone is a Class A Controlled Drug listed in the First Schedule to the Misuse of Drugs Act (CAP. 185).
During the trial, it was found out that for the conclusion to be made, thirty-three (33) tablets were sampled for the hypergeometric sampling. The accused claimed that this was not fair for him, as the other sixty-seven (67) tablets might not even contain any controlled drug. He insisted that all 100 tablets should be sampled for testing and the weight of the pure controlled drug should be given as well.
Based on your understanding of hypergeometric sampling, explain to the accused why it is not necessary:
- to sample all 100 tablets for analysis;
- to quantify the pure weight of the controlled drug.
Looking for Plagiarism free Answers for your college/ university Assignments.
- LEGL2002 Enforceability of Contracts and Director Authority in Business Organisations
- HBC201 Exploring NEET Youth in Singapore: Factors, Challenges, and Reintegration Strategies
- MGT204 In-depth Financial Analysis and Investment Strategies for Lioncity Pte Ltd
- EIPM: Sheng Siong Company Valuation Report – Investment Analysis & Recommendations, GBA 4
- ICT239 BMI App Development and Enhancement | ECA – SUSS
- FMT302 Facility Maintenance and Indoor Air Quality Management, ECA
- K-Pop Music Festival Poster Design | Assessment 2, Course Work
- Strategic Implementation of IBM’s Global Talent Analytics: Case study Analysis | Assessment 2
- HFS206 Occupational Biomechanics Assignment Question Papers – SUSS
- PSY205 Analyzing AI Bias: Prejudice in Language Technology and Its Impact in Singapore